Descriptive Statements:
- Use language and style appropriate to the specified audience, purpose, and occasion.
- State and maintain a clear main idea and point of view/perspective with a focused thesis statement.
- Provide reasoned, relevant, and specific evidence to support the thesis statement and expand upon the main idea and point of view/perspective.
- Select and apply an organizational structure that enhances meaning and is logically sequenced from sentence to sentence and from paragraph to paragraph.
- Use precise word choices that accurately and effectively convey meaning and support the thesis statement.
- Use correct grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation according to standard writing conventions.
Sample Written Assignment:
It has been proposed that individuals pay a tax on everyday purchases in order to fund free college education for all. Write a composition, to be read by an audience of adults, in which you:
- discuss why you agree or disagree with this proposal; and
- defend your position with logical arguments and specific examples.
Sample Responses
Sample Strong Response (Show Sample Strong ResponseHide Sample Strong Response)
In recent decades, college tuition has become increasingly expensive, meaning that for most Americans, higher education has become either an impossible dream or one realized only at the cost of crushing student loan debt. I agree that providing access to a free college education for all is a moral imperative, and I believe we can do it without breaking the bank or imposing new financial burdens on already cash-strapped Americans.
In the twenty-first century, a college education has become a prerequisite for employment. Community colleges serve a vital role in our democracy by offering affordable higher education to all. To ensure that they continue to fill this role, community colleges should offer free tuition. Some people have suggested funding such programs with a tax on everyday purchases such as food, clothing, housewares, and gasoline. I disagree with this plan, however, because placing an additional tax on everyday purchases hardly seems like it would lessen the financial burden on struggling families. Higher education should not be paid for by taxing the citizens we are seeking to educate, but by reallocating current tax revenues or by taxing luxury goods like Rolex watches and Bugatti automobiles at a higher rate.
Extending free tuition to four-year public colleges might be unrealistic, but the calls to do so might be less vehement if colleges found a way to lower their prices. College tuition has never been free, but four years at a state university was once a manageable cost for some families. However, competition between colleges has led to outlandish prices as new administrative offices are created, exorbitant salaries are paid to faculty and administration, and luxury amenities are provided for students. State-of-the-art fitness rooms and poke bowl stations in the dining halls may entice prospective students, but they do little to improve the quality of education. If colleges were more frugal in their spending, they could provide a quality education at a reasonable cost.
In conclusion, I support universal access to free college education. This should not be achieved by placing an additional tax on everyday purchases, but by reallocating current tax revenues or by taxing luxury goods at a higher rate. A two-year community college education should be free for all who want it. At the same time, four-year colleges and universities have a civic and moral obligation to drastically lower their costs by refocusing on a quality education instead of extravagant extras.
Sample Weak Response (Show Sample Weak ResponseHide Sample Weak Response)
I disagree with this proposal to pay tax on everyday purchases in order to fund free college education for all. Even if college was free I don't think it should be required for all. Not every person wants to be a doctor or lawyer. We already have a free high scholl, that is enough. It gives you enough education that you can go out and get a job later on, or go on and go to college if that's what you perfer. My brother never went to college, he fixed computers during high school and then after he got a job in IT. Now he is a consultant pulling in over 150,000 a year.
We already spent 13 years in school and that's enough. You shouldn't have to go for another 4 years. How long are we supposed to spend all our daily hours in school? At some point you need to get on with your life. School is supposed to prepare you for the future but what if you never get to the future, just keep poseponing it, then what are you preparing for? That's fine as I made the point above that if you want to be a doctor, an engineer, a lawyer, you need that advance degree. But for most jobs 13 years is enough. If not then what have we been doing all this time?
The last thing anything wants is more taxes to pay. That will go over like a led baloon. Don't we pay enough taxes already? Especailly if we ourselves arent going to go to college. Then I would be paying taxes for someone else to go to college for free. Turn around, four years, that person is getting a job that pays 150,000 and I'm still working at fast food places. That makes zero sense. They should pay me.
To conclude I don't agree that we should have free college education for all. 13 years is enough time, let them get out and get started on Life.